DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

2016 Renault Megane vs 2016 Mazda 3 Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Mazda 3

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 1 points.

58.25–59.25
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

RenaultMakeMazda
MeganeModel3
2016Model year2016
CoupeBody typeHatchback
5Seats5
3Doors5

Performance

12,3 s0–100 km/h10,8 s
190 km/hTop speed182 km/h
1461 ccEngine displacement1496 cc
95 HPPower100 HP
240 NmTorque150 Nm
4Cylinders4

Fuel & Consumption

DieselFuel typePetrol
60 ltFuel tank51 lt
4,9 ltUrban consumption6,5 lt
3,5 ltExtra-urban consumption4,3 lt
4,1 ltAverage consumption5,1 lt

Transmission & Chassis

Front-wheel driveDrivetrainFront-wheel drive
6Gears6
195/65 R15 91T; 205/55 R16 91H; 205/50 R17 89VTyre size205/60 R16
YesABSYes

Dimensions

4299 mmLength4460 mm
1785 mmWidth1795 mm
1423 mmHeight1450 mm
1205 KgWeight1190 Kg
2640 mmWheelbase2700 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

2016 Renault Megane and 2016 Mazda 3 approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Mazda 3 leads the E-Kıyasla score by 1 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…