DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

2016 Renault Megane vs 2016 Skoda Rapid Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Renault Megane

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points.

65.25–64.5
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

RenaultMakeSkoda
MeganeModelRapid
2016Model year2016
CoupeBody typeHatchback
5Seats5
3Doors5

Performance

9,7 s0–100 km/h9,8 s
190 km/hTop speed200 km/h
1197 ccEngine displacement1197 cc
132 HPPower110 HP
205 NmTorque175 Nm
4Cylinders4

Fuel & Consumption

PetrolFuel typePetrol
60 ltFuel tank55 lt
6,7 ltUrban consumption6,2 lt
4,6 ltExtra-urban consumption4,2 lt
5,4 ltAverage consumption4,9 lt

Transmission & Chassis

Front-wheel driveDrivetrainFront-wheel drive
6Gears6
205/55 R16 91H; 205/50 R17 89VTyre size—
YesABSYes

Dimensions

4299 mmLength4483 mm
1785 mmWidth1706 mm
1423 mmHeight1461 mm
1205 KgWeight1110 Kg
2640 mmWheelbase2602 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

2016 Renault Megane and 2016 Skoda Rapid approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Renault Megane leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…