DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

2016 Skoda Rapid vs 2016 Renault Megane Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Renault Megane

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points.

64.5–65.25
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

SkodaMakeRenault
RapidModelMegane
2016Model year2016
HatchbackBody typeCoupe
5Seats5
5Doors3

Performance

9,8 s0–100 km/h9,7 s
200 km/hTop speed190 km/h
1197 ccEngine displacement1197 cc
110 HPPower132 HP
175 NmTorque205 Nm
4Cylinders4

Fuel & Consumption

PetrolFuel typePetrol
55 ltFuel tank60 lt
6,2 ltUrban consumption6,7 lt
4,2 ltExtra-urban consumption4,6 lt
4,9 ltAverage consumption5,4 lt

Transmission & Chassis

Front-wheel driveDrivetrainFront-wheel drive
6Gears6
—Tyre size205/55 R16 91H; 205/50 R17 89V
YesABSYes

Dimensions

4483 mmLength4299 mm
1706 mmWidth1785 mm
1461 mmHeight1423 mm
1110 KgWeight1205 Kg
2602 mmWheelbase2640 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

2016 Skoda Rapid and 2016 Renault Megane approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Renault Megane leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…