DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

2000 Renault Laguna vs 2000 Mazda 323 Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Renault Laguna

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 1 points.

54.25–53.25
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

RenaultMakeMazda
LagunaModel323
2000Model year2000
HatchbackBody typeHatchback
5Seats5
5Doors5

Performance

11,6 s0–100 km/h12,2 s
190 km/hTop speed178 km/h
1998 ccEngine displacement1998 cc
114 HPPower90 HP
168 NmTorque220 Nm
4Cylinders4

Fuel & Consumption

PetrolFuel typeDiesel
66 ltFuel tank55 lt
13,1 ltUrban consumption6,4 lt
6,7 ltExtra-urban consumption4,4 lt
7,8 ltAverage consumption—

Transmission & Chassis

Front-wheel driveDrivetrainFront-wheel drive
4Gears5
195/65 R15Tyre size185/65 R14
YesABSYes

Dimensions

4508 mmLength4200 mm
1752 mmWidth1705 mm
1430 mmHeight1410 mm
1290 KgWeight1175 Kg
2670 mmWheelbase2610 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

2000 Renault Laguna and 2000 Mazda 323 approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Renault Laguna leads the E-Kıyasla score by 1 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…