DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

2013 Renault Kangoo vs 2013 Fiat Bravo Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Fiat Bravo

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 1 points.

56.25–57.25
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

RenaultMakeFiat
KangooModelBravo
2013Model year2013
MinivanBody typeHatchback
2Seats5
3Doors5

Performance

14,9 s0–100 km/h12,5 s
160 km/hTop speed179 km/h
1461 ccEngine displacement1368 cc
90 HPPower90 HP
220 NmTorque128 Nm
4Cylinders4

Fuel & Consumption

DieselFuel typePetrol
60 ltFuel tank58 lt
—Urban consumption8,0 lt
—Extra-urban consumption5,3 lt
5,1 ltAverage consumption6,7 lt

Transmission & Chassis

Front-wheel driveDrivetrainFront-wheel drive
6 EDCGears6
—TransmissionManual
195/65 R15 91 TTyre size16
YesABSYes

Dimensions

4282 mmLength4336 mm
1829 mmWidth1792 mm
1805 mmHeight1498 mm
1300-1430 KgWeight1180 kg
—Luggage capacity400 lt
2697 mmWheelbase—

Additional Features

Fiat BravoDriver AirbagPassenger AirbagSide AirbagABSEBDESPASRHill Start AssistTrip ComputerPower Rear WindowsPower Front WindowsManual Air ConditioningIlluminated Vanity MirrorRear Fog Lights

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

2013 Renault Kangoo and 2013 Fiat Bravo approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Fiat Bravo leads the E-Kıyasla score by 1 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…