DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

2004 Alfa Romeo 156 vs 2004 Renault Clio Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Renault Clio

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points.

53.5–54.25
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

Alfa RomeoMakeRenault
156ModelClio
2004Model year2004
SedanBody typeHatchback
5Seats5
4Doors3/5

Performance

10,5 s0–100 km/h9,6 s
200 km/hTop speed195 km/h
1598 ccEngine displacement1598 cc
120 HPPower107 HP
146 NmTorque148 Nm
4Cylinders4

Fuel & Consumption

PetrolFuel typePetrol
63 ltFuel tank50 lt
11,4 ltUrban consumption9,3 lt
6,4 ltExtra-urban consumption5,6 lt
8,2 ltAverage consumption—

Transmission & Chassis

Front-wheel driveDrivetrainFront-wheel drive
5Gears5
185/65 R15Tyre size185/60 R14
YesABSYes

Dimensions

4435 mmLength3773 mm
1743 mmWidth1640 mm
1430 mmHeight1417 mm
1265 KgWeight995 Kg
2595 mmWheelbase2472 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

2004 Alfa Romeo 156 and 2004 Renault Clio approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Renault Clio leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…