DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

2004 MG TF vs 2004 Alfa Romeo 156 Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

MG TF

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points.

54.25–53.5
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

MG TFSpecificationAlfa Romeo 156
MGMakeAlfa Romeo
TFModel156
2004Model year2004
CabrioletBody typeSedan
2Seats5
2Doors4

Performance

MG TFSpecificationAlfa Romeo 156
9,8 s0–100 km/h10,5 s
190 km/hTop speed200 km/h
1588 ccEngine displacement1598 cc
116 HPPower120 HP
145 NmTorque146 Nm
4Cylinders4

Fuel & Consumption

MG TFSpecificationAlfa Romeo 156
PetrolFuel typePetrol
50 ltFuel tank63 lt
9,7 ltUrban consumption11,4 lt
5,6 ltExtra-urban consumption6,4 lt
7,1 ltAverage consumption8,2 lt

Transmission & Chassis

MG TFSpecificationAlfa Romeo 156
Rear-wheel driveDrivetrainFront-wheel drive
5Gears5
185/55 R15; 205/50 R15Tyre size185/65 R15
YesABSYes

Dimensions

MG TFSpecificationAlfa Romeo 156
3943 mmLength4435 mm
1630 mmWidth1743 mm
1261 mmHeight1430 mm
1095 KgWeight1265 Kg
2375 mmWheelbase2595 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

2004 MG TF and 2004 Alfa Romeo 156 approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, MG TF leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…