DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

2000 Peugeot 106 vs 2000 Renault Kangoo Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Renault Kangoo

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.25 points.

43.25–43.5
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

PeugeotMakeRenault
106ModelKangoo
2000Model year2000
HatchbackBody typeMinivan
5Seats2
3/5Doors3

Performance

15,4 s0–100 km/h13,5 s
165 km/hTop speed148 km/h
1124 ccEngine displacement1149 cc
60 HPPower75 HP
91 NmTorque105 Nm
4Cylinders4

Fuel & Consumption

PetrolFuel typePetrol
45 ltFuel tank50 lt
8,4 ltUrban consumption9 lt
5,2 ltExtra-urban consumption5,9 lt
—Average consumption7 lt

Transmission & Chassis

Front-wheel driveDrivetrainFront-wheel drive
5Gears5
155/70R13Tyre size165/70 R14 T
YesABSYes

Dimensions

3678 mmLength3995 mm
1594 mmWidth1663 mm
1376 mmHeight1827 mm
815 KgWeight1065 Kg
2385 mmWheelbase2600 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

2000 Peugeot 106 and 2000 Renault Kangoo approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Renault Kangoo leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.25 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…