DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

2000 Renault Kangoo vs 2000 Mazda 121 Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Renault Kangoo

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.25 points.

43.5–43.25
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

RenaultMakeMazda
KangooModel121
2000Model year2000
MinivanBody typeHatchback
2Seats5
3Doors3/5

Performance

13,5 s0–100 km/h15,9 s
148 km/hTop speed155 km/h
1149 ccEngine displacement1299 cc
75 HPPower60 HP
105 NmTorque103 Nm
4Cylinders4

Fuel & Consumption

PetrolFuel typePetrol
50 ltFuel tank42 lt
9 ltUrban consumption7,6 lt
5,9 ltExtra-urban consumption4,9 lt
7 ltAverage consumption6,8 lt

Transmission & Chassis

Front-wheel driveDrivetrainFront-wheel drive
5Gears5
165/70 R14 TTyre size165/70 R13
YesABSYes

Dimensions

3995 mmLength3828 mm
1663 mmWidth1634 mm
1827 mmHeight1330 mm
1065 KgWeight930 Kg
2600 mmWheelbase2446 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

2000 Renault Kangoo and 2000 Mazda 121 approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Renault Kangoo leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.25 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…