DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

2005 Renault Clio vs 2004 Alfa Romeo 156 Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Alfa Romeo 156

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points.

78.75–79.5
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

RenaultMakeAlfa Romeo
ClioModel156
2005Model year2004
CoupeBody typeSedan
2Seats5
2Doors4

Performance

6,0 s0–100 km/h6,3 s
235 km/hTop speed250 km/h
2946 ccEngine displacement3179 cc
255 HPPower250 HP
300 NmTorque300 Nm
6Cylinders6

Fuel & Consumption

PetrolFuel typePetrol
61 ltFuel tank63 lt
14,9 ltUrban consumption18,1 lt
8,9 ltExtra-urban consumption8,6 lt
—Average consumption12,1 lt

Transmission & Chassis

Rear-wheel driveDrivetrainFront-wheel drive
5Gears6
205/50 R17; 235/45 R17Tyre size225/45 ZR 17
YesABSYes

Dimensions

3800 mmLength4430 mm
1810 mmWidth1745 mm
1360 mmHeight1415 mm
1335 KgWeight1410 Kg
2510 mmWheelbase2595 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

2005 Renault Clio and 2004 Alfa Romeo 156 approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Alfa Romeo 156 leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…