DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

2003 Renault Clio vs 2005 Jaguar S-type Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Jaguar S-type

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points.

75.75–76.5
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

RenaultMakeJaguar
ClioModelS-type
2003Model year2005
CoupeBody typeSedan
2Seats5
2Doors4

Performance

6,0 s0–100 km/h7,6 s
235 km/hTop speed233 km/h
2946 ccEngine displacement2967 cc
255 HPPower238 HP
300 NmTorque293 Nm
6Cylinders6

Fuel & Consumption

PetrolFuel typePetrol
61 ltFuel tank68 lt
14,9 ltUrban consumption16,5 lt
8,9 ltExtra-urban consumption8,1 lt
—Average consumption11,2 lt

Transmission & Chassis

Rear-wheel driveDrivetrainRear-wheel drive
5Gears5
205/50 R17; 235/45 R17Tyre size225/55 R16 W
YesABSYes

Dimensions

3800 mmLength4861 mm
1810 mmWidth1819 mm
1360 mmHeight1441 mm
1335 KgWeight1705 Kg
2510 mmWheelbase2909 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

2003 Renault Clio and 2005 Jaguar S-type approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Jaguar S-type leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…