DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

2005 Jaguar XJ vs 2003 Renault Clio Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Jaguar XJ

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points.

76.5–75.75
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

JaguarMakeRenault
XJModelClio
2005Model year2003
SedanBody typeCoupe
5Seats2
4Doors2

Performance

8,1 s0–100 km/h6,0 s
233 km/hTop speed235 km/h
2967 ccEngine displacement2946 cc
238 HPPower255 HP
293 NmTorque300 Nm
6Cylinders6

Fuel & Consumption

PetrolFuel typePetrol
85 ltFuel tank61 lt
15,3 ltUrban consumption14,9 lt
7,7 ltExtra-urban consumption8,9 lt
10,5 ltAverage consumption—

Transmission & Chassis

Rear-wheel driveDrivetrainRear-wheel drive
6Gears5
235/45 R17Tyre size205/50 R17; 235/45 R17
YesABSYes

Dimensions

5090 mmLength3800 mm
1860 mmWidth1810 mm
1448 mmHeight1360 mm
1545 KgWeight1335 Kg
3034 mmWheelbase2510 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

2005 Jaguar XJ and 2003 Renault Clio approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Jaguar XJ leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…