DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

2009 Renault Clio vs 2010 Volvo S60 Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Renault Clio

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points.

68.5–67.75
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

RenaultMakeVolvo
ClioModelS60
2009Model year2010
HatchbackBody typeSedan
5Seats5
3Doors4

Performance

6,9 s0–100 km/h7,7 s
215 km/hTop speed0 km/h
1998 ccEngine displacement1999 cc
197 HPPower203 HP
215 NmTorque300 Nm
4Cylinders4

Fuel & Consumption

PetrolFuel typePetrol
50 ltFuel tank67 lt
12,2 ltUrban consumption—
7,1 ltExtra-urban consumption—
9,6 ltAverage consumption7,9 lt

Transmission & Chassis

Front-wheel driveDrivetrainFront-wheel drive
6Gears6
215/45 R17Tyre size—
—ABSYes

Dimensions

3818 mmLength4628 mm
1639 mmWidth1865 mm
1417 mmHeight1484 mm
1240 KgWeight1711 Kg
2472 mmWheelbase2776 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

2009 Renault Clio and 2010 Volvo S60 approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Renault Clio leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…