DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

2010 Volvo V60 vs 2009 Renault Clio Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Renault Clio

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points.

67.75–68.5
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

VolvoMakeRenault
V60ModelClio
2010Model year2009
EstateBody typeHatchback
5Seats5
5Doors3

Performance

7,9 s0–100 km/h6,9 s
0 km/hTop speed215 km/h
1999 ccEngine displacement1998 cc
203 HPPower197 HP
300 NmTorque215 Nm
4Cylinders4

Fuel & Consumption

PetrolFuel typePetrol
67 ltFuel tank50 lt
11,3 ltUrban consumption12,2 lt
6,3 ltExtra-urban consumption7,1 lt
8,1 ltAverage consumption9,6 lt

Transmission & Chassis

Front-wheel driveDrivetrainFront-wheel drive
6Gears6
—Tyre size215/45 R17
YesABS—

Dimensions

4628 mmLength3818 mm
1865 mmWidth1639 mm
1484 mmHeight1417 mm
1545 KgWeight1240 Kg
2776 mmWheelbase2472 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

2010 Volvo V60 and 2009 Renault Clio approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Renault Clio leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…