DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

2005 Renault Clio vs 2005 Mazda 6 Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Renault Clio

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points.

68.5–67.75
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

Renault ClioSpecificationMazda 6
RenaultMakeMazda
ClioModel6
2005Model year2005
HatchbackBody typeEstate
5Seats5
3Doors5

Performance

Renault ClioSpecificationMazda 6
6,9 s0–100 km/h9,8 s
215 km/hTop speed201 km/h
1998 ccEngine displacement1998 cc
197 HPPower143 HP
215 NmTorque360 Nm
4Cylinders4

Fuel & Consumption

Renault ClioSpecificationMazda 6
PetrolFuel typeDiesel
50 ltFuel tank64 lt
12,2 ltUrban consumption7,6 lt
7,1 ltExtra-urban consumption5,2 lt
9,6 ltAverage consumption6,1 lt

Transmission & Chassis

Renault ClioSpecificationMazda 6
Front-wheel driveDrivetrainFront-wheel drive
6Gears6
215/45 R17Tyre size205/55 R16 H
—ABSYes

Dimensions

Renault ClioSpecificationMazda 6
3818 mmLength4710 mm
1639 mmWidth1780 mm
1417 mmHeight1480 mm
1240 KgWeight1520 Kg
2472 mmWheelbase2675 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

2005 Renault Clio and 2005 Mazda 6 approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Renault Clio leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…