DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

2005 Mazda 6 vs 2005 Renault Clio Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Renault Clio

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points.

67.75–68.5
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

Mazda 6SpecificationRenault Clio
MazdaMakeRenault
6ModelClio
2005Model year2005
EstateBody typeHatchback
5Seats5
5Doors3

Performance

Mazda 6SpecificationRenault Clio
9,8 s0–100 km/h6,9 s
201 km/hTop speed215 km/h
1998 ccEngine displacement1998 cc
143 HPPower197 HP
360 NmTorque215 Nm
4Cylinders4

Fuel & Consumption

Mazda 6SpecificationRenault Clio
DieselFuel typePetrol
64 ltFuel tank50 lt
7,6 ltUrban consumption12,2 lt
5,2 ltExtra-urban consumption7,1 lt
6,1 ltAverage consumption9,6 lt

Transmission & Chassis

Mazda 6SpecificationRenault Clio
Front-wheel driveDrivetrainFront-wheel drive
6Gears6
205/55 R16 HTyre size215/45 R17
YesABS—

Dimensions

Mazda 6SpecificationRenault Clio
4710 mmLength3818 mm
1780 mmWidth1639 mm
1480 mmHeight1417 mm
1520 KgWeight1240 Kg
2675 mmWheelbase2472 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

2005 Mazda 6 and 2005 Renault Clio approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Renault Clio leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…