DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

2004 Renault Clio vs 2004 Seat Altea Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Renault Clio

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points.

65.5–64.75
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

RenaultMakeSeat
ClioModelAltea
2004Model year2004
HatchbackBody typeMinivan
5Seats5
3Doors5

Performance

7,3 s0–100 km/h9,9 s
220 km/hTop speed201 km/h
1998 ccEngine displacement1968 cc
169 HPPower140 HP
200 NmTorque320 Nm
4Cylinders4

Fuel & Consumption

PetrolFuel typeDiesel
50 ltFuel tank55 lt
10,5 ltUrban consumption7,7 lt
6,4 ltExtra-urban consumption4,8 lt
—Average consumption5,9 lt

Transmission & Chassis

Front-wheel driveDrivetrainFront-wheel drive
5Gears6
195/50 R15Tyre size205/55 R16
YesABSYes

Dimensions

3773 mmLength4280 mm
1640 mmWidth1768 mm
1420 mmHeight1568 mm
1035 KgWeight1430 Kg
2472 mmWheelbase2578 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

2004 Renault Clio and 2004 Seat Altea approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Renault Clio leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…