DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

2004 Alfa Romeo 156 vs 2004 Renault Clio Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Renault Clio

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points.

64.75–65.5
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

Alfa RomeoMakeRenault
156ModelClio
2004Model year2004
EstateBody typeHatchback
5Seats5
5Doors3

Performance

10,2 s0–100 km/h7,3 s
200 km/hTop speed220 km/h
1910 ccEngine displacement1998 cc
150 HPPower169 HP
305 NmTorque200 Nm
4Cylinders4

Fuel & Consumption

DieselFuel typePetrol
50 ltFuel tank50 lt
8,9 ltUrban consumption10,5 lt
5,6 ltExtra-urban consumption6,4 lt
6,8 ltAverage consumption—

Transmission & Chassis

4x4DrivetrainFront-wheel drive
6Gears5
205/50 R17Tyre size195/50 R15
YesABSYes

Dimensions

4441 mmLength3773 mm
1743 mmWidth1640 mm
1458 mmHeight1420 mm
1510 KgWeight1035 Kg
2595 mmWheelbase2472 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

2004 Alfa Romeo 156 and 2004 Renault Clio approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Renault Clio leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…