DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

2000 Renault Clio vs 2000 Ford Galaxy Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Renault Clio

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 1 points.

50.25–49.25
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

RenaultMakeFord
ClioModelGalaxy
2000Model year2000
HatchbackBody typeMinivan
5Seats7
3/5Doors5

Performance

12,8 s0–100 km/h17,1 s
174 km/hTop speed160 km/h
1870 ccEngine displacement1896 cc
80 HPPower90 HP
160 NmTorque210 Nm
4Cylinders4

Fuel & Consumption

DieselFuel typeDiesel
40 ltFuel tank70 lt
6,7 ltUrban consumption8,8 lt
4,3 ltExtra-urban consumption5,6 lt
—Average consumption6,7 lt

Transmission & Chassis

Front-wheel driveDrivetrainFront-wheel drive
5Gears5
175/65 R14Tyre size195/65R15
YesABSYes

Dimensions

3773 mmLength4641 mm
1640 mmWidth1810 mm
1417 mmHeight1732 mm
980 KgWeight1670 Kg
2472 mmWheelbase2835 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

2000 Renault Clio and 2000 Ford Galaxy approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Renault Clio leads the E-Kıyasla score by 1 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…