DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

2000 Daewoo Rezzo vs 2000 Renault Clio Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Daewoo Rezzo

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 1 points.

51.25–50.25
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

DaewooMakeRenault
RezzoModelClio
2000Model year2000
MinivanBody typeHatchback
5Seats5
5Doors3/5

Performance

12,0 s0–100 km/h12,8 s
170 km/hTop speed174 km/h
1796 ccEngine displacement1870 cc
101 HPPower80 HP
146 NmTorque160 Nm
4Cylinders4

Fuel & Consumption

PetrolFuel typeDiesel
60 ltFuel tank40 lt
12,5 ltUrban consumption6,7 lt
7,2 ltExtra-urban consumption4,3 lt
9,3 ltAverage consumption—

Transmission & Chassis

Front-wheel driveDrivetrainFront-wheel drive
5Gears5
195/60 R15Tyre size175/65 R14
YesABSYes

Dimensions

4350 mmLength3773 mm
1755 mmWidth1640 mm
1580 mmHeight1417 mm
1230 KgWeight980 Kg
2600 mmWheelbase2472 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

2000 Daewoo Rezzo and 2000 Renault Clio approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Daewoo Rezzo leads the E-Kıyasla score by 1 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…