DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

2000 Renault Clio vs 2000 Daewoo Rezzo Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Daewoo Rezzo

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 1 points.

50.25–51.25
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

RenaultMakeDaewoo
ClioModelRezzo
2000Model year2000
HatchbackBody typeMinivan
5Seats5
3/5Doors5

Performance

12,8 s0–100 km/h12,0 s
174 km/hTop speed170 km/h
1870 ccEngine displacement1796 cc
80 HPPower101 HP
160 NmTorque146 Nm
4Cylinders4

Fuel & Consumption

DieselFuel typePetrol
40 ltFuel tank60 lt
6,7 ltUrban consumption12,5 lt
4,3 ltExtra-urban consumption7,2 lt
—Average consumption9,3 lt

Transmission & Chassis

Front-wheel driveDrivetrainFront-wheel drive
5Gears5
175/65 R14Tyre size195/60 R15
YesABSYes

Dimensions

3773 mmLength4350 mm
1640 mmWidth1755 mm
1417 mmHeight1580 mm
980 KgWeight1230 Kg
2472 mmWheelbase2600 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

2000 Renault Clio and 2000 Daewoo Rezzo approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Daewoo Rezzo leads the E-Kıyasla score by 1 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…