DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

1997 Renault Clio vs 1997 Rover MGF Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Rover MGF

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points.

55.5–56.25
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

RenaultMakeRover
ClioModelMGF
1997Model year1997
HatchbackBody typeCabriolet
5Seats2
3/5Doors2

Performance

8,9 s0–100 km/h9,2 s
209 km/hTop speed193 km/h
1764 ccEngine displacement1796 cc
135 HPPower120 HP
0 NmTorque160 Nm
4Cylinders4

Fuel & Consumption

PetrolFuel typePetrol
43 ltFuel tank50 lt
—Average consumption6,7 lt

Transmission & Chassis

Front-wheel driveDrivetrainRear-wheel drive
5Gears5
185/55 R15 VTyre size185/55 VR15; 205/50 VR15
—ABSYes

Dimensions

3709 mmLength3913 mm
1616 mmWidth1628 mm
1395 mmHeight1464 mm
955 KgWeight1060 Kg
2472 mmWheelbase2375 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

1997 Renault Clio and 1997 Rover MGF approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Rover MGF leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…