DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

1997 Rover MGF vs 1997 Renault Clio Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Rover MGF

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points.

56.25–55.5
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

RoverMakeRenault
MGFModelClio
1997Model year1997
CabrioletBody typeHatchback
2Seats5
2Doors3/5

Performance

9,2 s0–100 km/h8,9 s
193 km/hTop speed209 km/h
1796 ccEngine displacement1764 cc
120 HPPower135 HP
160 NmTorque0 Nm
4Cylinders4

Fuel & Consumption

PetrolFuel typePetrol
50 ltFuel tank43 lt
6,7 ltAverage consumption—

Transmission & Chassis

Rear-wheel driveDrivetrainFront-wheel drive
5Gears5
185/55 VR15; 205/50 VR15Tyre size185/55 R15 V
YesABS—

Dimensions

3913 mmLength3709 mm
1628 mmWidth1616 mm
1464 mmHeight1395 mm
1060 KgWeight955 Kg
2375 mmWheelbase2472 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

1997 Rover MGF and 1997 Renault Clio approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Rover MGF leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…