DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

1996 Renault Clio vs 1996 Mitsubishi Galant Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Mitsubishi Galant

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points.

55.5–56.25
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

RenaultMakeMitsubishi
ClioModelGalant
1996Model year1996
HatchbackBody typeSedan
5Seats5
3/5Doors4

Performance

8,9 s0–100 km/h9,0 s
209 km/hTop speed180 km/h
1764 ccEngine displacement1829 cc
135 HPPower135 HP
0 NmTorque167 Nm
4Cylinders6

Fuel & Consumption

PetrolFuel typePetrol
43 ltFuel tank64 lt
—Urban consumption12 lt
—Extra-urban consumption7 lt

Transmission & Chassis

Front-wheel driveDrivetrainFront-wheel drive
5Gears5
185/55 R15 VTyre size185/70 R14
—ABSYes

Dimensions

3709 mmLength4620 mm
1616 mmWidth1730 mm
1395 mmHeight1405 mm
955 KgWeight1200 Kg
2472 mmWheelbase2635 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

1996 Renault Clio and 1996 Mitsubishi Galant approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Mitsubishi Galant leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…