DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

1996 Mitsubishi Galant vs 1996 Renault Clio Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Mitsubishi Galant

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points.

56.25–55.5
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

MitsubishiMakeRenault
GalantModelClio
1996Model year1996
SedanBody typeHatchback
5Seats5
4Doors3/5

Performance

9,0 s0–100 km/h8,9 s
180 km/hTop speed209 km/h
1829 ccEngine displacement1764 cc
135 HPPower135 HP
167 NmTorque0 Nm
6Cylinders4

Fuel & Consumption

PetrolFuel typePetrol
64 ltFuel tank43 lt
12 ltUrban consumption—
7 ltExtra-urban consumption—

Transmission & Chassis

Front-wheel driveDrivetrainFront-wheel drive
5Gears5
185/70 R14Tyre size185/55 R15 V
YesABS—

Dimensions

4620 mmLength3709 mm
1730 mmWidth1616 mm
1405 mmHeight1395 mm
1200 KgWeight955 Kg
2635 mmWheelbase2472 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

1996 Mitsubishi Galant and 1996 Renault Clio approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Mitsubishi Galant leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…