DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

1996 Renault Clio vs 1996 Hyundai Lantra Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Hyundai Lantra

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points.

55.5–56.25
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

RenaultMakeHyundai
ClioModelLantra
1996Model year1996
HatchbackBody typeSedan
5Seats5
3/5Doors4

Performance

8,9 s0–100 km/h9,4 s
209 km/hTop speed196 km/h
1764 ccEngine displacement1795 cc
135 HPPower128 HP
0 NmTorque162 Nm
4Cylinders4

Fuel & Consumption

PetrolFuel typePetrol
43 ltFuel tank55 lt
—Urban consumption10,8 lt
—Extra-urban consumption7,2 lt

Transmission & Chassis

Front-wheel driveDrivetrainFront-wheel drive
5Gears5
185/55 R15 VTyre size195/60 R14
—ABSYes

Dimensions

3709 mmLength4420 mm
1616 mmWidth1700 mm
1395 mmHeight1393 mm
955 KgWeight1247 Kg
2472 mmWheelbase2550 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

1996 Renault Clio and 1996 Hyundai Lantra approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Hyundai Lantra leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…