DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

2006 Renault Clio vs 2006 Opel Combo Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Renault Clio

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 1 points.

50.25–49.25
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

RenaultMakeOpel
ClioModelCombo
2006Model year2006
HatchbackBody typeMinivan
5Seats5
3/5Doors5

Performance

11,9 s0–100 km/h15,5 s
177 km/hTop speed155 km/h
1598 ccEngine displacement1686 cc
88 HPPower75 HP
140 NmTorque165 Nm
4Cylinders4

Fuel & Consumption

PetrolFuel typeDiesel
50 ltFuel tank52 lt
8,8 ltUrban consumption6,6 lt
5,4 ltExtra-urban consumption4,7 lt
6,6 ltAverage consumption5,4 lt

Transmission & Chassis

Front-wheel driveDrivetrainFront-wheel drive
5Gears5
185/60 R15Tyre size185/60 R15
—ABSYes

Dimensions

3818 mmLength4322 mm
1639 mmWidth1684 mm
1417 mmHeight1801 mm
1150 KgWeight1205 Kg
2472 mmWheelbase2716 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

2006 Renault Clio and 2006 Opel Combo approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Renault Clio leads the E-Kıyasla score by 1 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…