DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

2006 Renault Trafic vs 2006 Renault Clio Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Renault Clio

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points.

49.5–50.25
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

RenaultMakeRenault
TraficModelClio
2006Model year2006
MinivanBody typeHatchback
9Seats5
4Doors3/5

Performance

14,9 s0–100 km/h11,9 s
138 km/hTop speed177 km/h
1870 ccEngine displacement1598 cc
82 HPPower88 HP
190 NmTorque140 Nm
—Cylinders4

Fuel & Consumption

DieselFuel typePetrol
90 ltFuel tank50 lt
9,8 ltUrban consumption8,8 lt
6,8 ltExtra-urban consumption5,4 lt
7,7 ltAverage consumption6,6 lt

Transmission & Chassis

Front-wheel driveDrivetrainFront-wheel drive
5Gears5
195/65 R16Tyre size185/60 R15
YesABS—

Dimensions

4782 mmLength3818 mm
1904 mmWidth1639 mm
1940 mmHeight1417 mm
1791 KgWeight1150 Kg
3098 mmWheelbase2472 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

2006 Renault Trafic and 2006 Renault Clio approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Renault Clio leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…