DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

2000 Renault Clio vs 1999 Renault Scenic Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Renault Clio

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 1 points.

47.25–46.25
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

RenaultMakeRenault
ClioModelScenic
2000Model year1999
HatchbackBody typeMinivan, MPV
5Seats5
3/5Doors5

Performance

10,6 s0–100 km/h13,7 s
181 km/hTop speed170 km/h
1598 ccEngine displacement1598 cc
90 HPPower90 HP
131 NmTorque137 Nm
4Cylinders4

Fuel & Consumption

PetrolFuel typePetrol
50 ltFuel tank60 lt
9,6 ltUrban consumption11,0 lt
5,8 ltExtra-urban consumption6,6 lt
—Average consumption8,2 lt

Transmission & Chassis

Front-wheel driveDrivetrainFront-wheel drive
5Gears5
165/70 R13Tyre size175/70 R14
YesABS—

Dimensions

3773 mmLength4134 mm
1640 mmWidth1719 mm
1417 mmHeight1675 mm
965 KgWeight1220 Kg
2472 mmWheelbase2580 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

2000 Renault Clio and 1999 Renault Scenic approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Renault Clio leads the E-Kıyasla score by 1 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…