2000 • Renault
Clio
Renault Clio 1.6 (B/CB0D) 2000Overall Score47.25/100
2000 Renault Clio vs 1999 Ford Escort Comparison
Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.
1999 • Ford
Escort
Ford Escort 1.6 (90 Hp) 1999Overall Score46.25/100
WINNER
Renault Clio
Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 1 points.
47.25–46.25
SPECIFICATION GROUPS
Every difference between the two cars
Basic Specifications
Renault ClioSpecificationFord Escort
RenaultMakeFord
ClioModelEscort
2000Model year1999
HatchbackBody typeEstate
5Seats5
3/5Doors5
Performance
Renault ClioSpecificationFord Escort
10,6 s0–100 km/h11,0 s
181 km/hTop speed180 km/h
1598 ccEngine displacement1600 cc
90 HPPower90 HP
131 NmTorque134 Nm
4Cylinders4
Fuel & Consumption
Renault ClioSpecificationFord Escort
PetrolFuel typePetrol
50 ltFuel tank55 lt
9,6 ltUrban consumption11 lt
5,8 ltExtra-urban consumption6 lt
—Average consumption8 lt
Transmission & Chassis
Renault ClioSpecificationFord Escort
Front-wheel driveDrivetrainFront-wheel drive
5Gears4
165/70 R13Tyre size175/70/13
YesABS—
Dimensions
Renault ClioSpecificationFord Escort
3773 mmLength—
1640 mmWidth—
1417 mmHeight—
965 KgWeight1200 Kg
2472 mmWheelbase—
E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note
2000 Renault Clio and 1999 Ford Escort approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.
Overall, Renault Clio leads the E-Kıyasla score by 1 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.
SIMILAR COMPARISONS
Similar comparisons
Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.
VS
VS
VS
VSComments are loading…