2000 • Ford
Escort
Ford Escort 1.6 i 16V (90 Hp) 2000Overall Score47.25/100
2000 Ford Escort vs 1999 Renault Clio Comparison
Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.
1999 • Renault
Clio
Renault Clio 1.6 (B/CB0D) 1999Overall Score46.25/100
WINNER
Ford Escort
Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 1 points.
47.25–46.25
SPECIFICATION GROUPS
Every difference between the two cars
Basic Specifications
Ford EscortSpecificationRenault Clio
FordMakeRenault
EscortModelClio
2000Model year1999
SedanBody typeHatchback
5Seats5
4Doors3/5
Performance
Ford EscortSpecificationRenault Clio
12,5 s0–100 km/h10,6 s
177 km/hTop speed181 km/h
1597 ccEngine displacement1598 cc
90 HPPower90 HP
134 NmTorque131 Nm
4Cylinders4
Fuel & Consumption
Ford EscortSpecificationRenault Clio
PetrolFuel typePetrol
55 ltFuel tank50 lt
—Urban consumption9,6 lt
—Extra-urban consumption5,8 lt
7,4 ltAverage consumption—
Transmission & Chassis
Ford EscortSpecificationRenault Clio
Front-wheel driveDrivetrainFront-wheel drive
5Gears5
175/70 R13 TTyre size165/70 R13
YesABSYes
Dimensions
Ford EscortSpecificationRenault Clio
4293 mmLength3773 mm
1700 mmWidth1640 mm
1394 mmHeight1417 mm
1105 KgWeight965 Kg
2525 mmWheelbase2472 mm
E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note
2000 Ford Escort and 1999 Renault Clio approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.
Overall, Ford Escort leads the E-Kıyasla score by 1 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.
SIMILAR COMPARISONS
Similar comparisons
Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.
VS
VS
VS
VS
VSComments are loading…