1999 • Renault
Clio
Renault Clio 1.6 (B/CB0D) 1999Overall Score46.25/100
1999 Renault Clio vs 2000 Ford Escort Comparison
Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.
2000 • Ford
Escort
Ford Escort 1.6 i 16V (90 Hp) 2000Overall Score47.25/100
WINNER
Ford Escort
Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 1 points.
46.25–47.25
SPECIFICATION GROUPS
Every difference between the two cars
Basic Specifications
Renault ClioSpecificationFord Escort
RenaultMakeFord
ClioModelEscort
1999Model year2000
HatchbackBody typeSedan
5Seats5
3/5Doors4
Performance
Renault ClioSpecificationFord Escort
10,6 s0–100 km/h12,5 s
181 km/hTop speed177 km/h
1598 ccEngine displacement1597 cc
90 HPPower90 HP
131 NmTorque134 Nm
4Cylinders4
Fuel & Consumption
Renault ClioSpecificationFord Escort
PetrolFuel typePetrol
50 ltFuel tank55 lt
9,6 ltUrban consumption—
5,8 ltExtra-urban consumption—
—Average consumption7,4 lt
Transmission & Chassis
Renault ClioSpecificationFord Escort
Front-wheel driveDrivetrainFront-wheel drive
5Gears5
165/70 R13Tyre size175/70 R13 T
YesABSYes
Dimensions
Renault ClioSpecificationFord Escort
3773 mmLength4293 mm
1640 mmWidth1700 mm
1417 mmHeight1394 mm
965 KgWeight1105 Kg
2472 mmWheelbase2525 mm
E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note
1999 Renault Clio and 2000 Ford Escort approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.
Overall, Ford Escort leads the E-Kıyasla score by 1 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.
SIMILAR COMPARISONS
Similar comparisons
Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.
VS
VS
VSComments are loading…