DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

2001 Renault Clio vs 2001 MG ZS Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Renault Clio

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points.

54.25–53.5
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

Renault ClioSpecificationMG ZS
RenaultMakeMG
ClioModelZS
2001Model year2001
HatchbackBody typeSedan
5Seats5
3/5Doors4

Performance

Renault ClioSpecificationMG ZS
9,6 s0–100 km/h9,0 s
195 km/hTop speed19 km/h
1598 ccEngine displacement1795 cc
107 HPPower117 HP
148 NmTorque160 Nm
4Cylinders4

Fuel & Consumption

Renault ClioSpecificationMG ZS
PetrolFuel typePetrol
50 ltFuel tank55 lt
9,3 ltUrban consumption9,7 lt
5,6 ltExtra-urban consumption5,8 lt
—Average consumption7,3 lt

Transmission & Chassis

Renault ClioSpecificationMG ZS
Front-wheel driveDrivetrainFront-wheel drive
5Gears5
185/60 R14Tyre size205/45 R17
YesABSYes

Dimensions

Renault ClioSpecificationMG ZS
3773 mmLength4520 mm
1640 mmWidth1700 mm
1417 mmHeight1390 mm
995 KgWeight1125 Kg
2472 mmWheelbase2620 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

2001 Renault Clio and 2001 MG ZS approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Renault Clio leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…