DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

2001 MG ZS vs 2001 Renault Clio Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Renault Clio

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points.

53.5–54.25
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

MG ZSSpecificationRenault Clio
MGMakeRenault
ZSModelClio
2001Model year2001
SedanBody typeHatchback
5Seats5
4Doors3/5

Performance

MG ZSSpecificationRenault Clio
9,0 s0–100 km/h9,6 s
19 km/hTop speed195 km/h
1795 ccEngine displacement1598 cc
117 HPPower107 HP
160 NmTorque148 Nm
4Cylinders4

Fuel & Consumption

MG ZSSpecificationRenault Clio
PetrolFuel typePetrol
55 ltFuel tank50 lt
9,7 ltUrban consumption9,3 lt
5,8 ltExtra-urban consumption5,6 lt
7,3 ltAverage consumption—

Transmission & Chassis

MG ZSSpecificationRenault Clio
Front-wheel driveDrivetrainFront-wheel drive
5Gears5
205/45 R17Tyre size185/60 R14
YesABSYes

Dimensions

MG ZSSpecificationRenault Clio
4520 mmLength3773 mm
1700 mmWidth1640 mm
1390 mmHeight1417 mm
1125 KgWeight995 Kg
2620 mmWheelbase2472 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

2001 MG ZS and 2001 Renault Clio approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Renault Clio leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…