DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

2000 Renault Clio vs 2000 Alfa Romeo 156 Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Renault Clio

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points.

54.25–53.5
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

RenaultMakeAlfa Romeo
ClioModel156
2000Model year2000
HatchbackBody typeSedan
5Seats5
3/5Doors4

Performance

9,6 s0–100 km/h10,5 s
195 km/hTop speed200 km/h
1598 ccEngine displacement1598 cc
107 HPPower120 HP
148 NmTorque144 Nm
4Cylinders4

Fuel & Consumption

PetrolFuel typePetrol
50 ltFuel tank63 lt
9,3 ltUrban consumption11,4 lt
5,6 ltExtra-urban consumption6,4 lt

Transmission & Chassis

Front-wheel driveDrivetrainFront-wheel drive
5Gears5
185/60 R14Tyre size185/65R15
YesABSYes

Dimensions

3773 mmLength4430 mm
1640 mmWidth1745 mm
1417 mmHeight1415 mm
995 KgWeight1230 Kg
2472 mmWheelbase2595 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

2000 Renault Clio and 2000 Alfa Romeo 156 approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Renault Clio leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…