DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

1999 Renault Clio vs 2000 Renault Clio Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Renault Clio

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 1 points.

53.25–54.25
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

RenaultMakeRenault
ClioModelClio
1999Model year2000
HatchbackBody typeHatchback
5Seats5
3/5Doors3/5

Performance

9,6 s0–100 km/h9,6 s
195 km/hTop speed195 km/h
1598 ccEngine displacement1598 cc
107 HPPower107 HP
148 NmTorque148 Nm
4Cylinders4

Fuel & Consumption

PetrolFuel typePetrol
50 ltFuel tank50 lt
9,3 ltUrban consumption9,3 lt
5,6 ltExtra-urban consumption5,6 lt

Transmission & Chassis

Front-wheel driveDrivetrainFront-wheel drive
5Gears5
185/60 R14Tyre size185/60 R14
YesABSYes

Dimensions

3773 mmLength3773 mm
1640 mmWidth1640 mm
1417 mmHeight1417 mm
995 KgWeight995 Kg
2472 mmWheelbase2472 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

1999 Renault Clio and 2000 Renault Clio approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Renault Clio leads the E-Kıyasla score by 1 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…