DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

1996 Renault Clio vs 2000 Renault Clio Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Renault Clio

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 1 points.

46.25–47.25
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

RenaultMakeRenault
ClioModelClio
1996Model year2000
HatchbackBody typeSedan
5Seats5
3/5Doors4

Performance

11,3 s0–100 km/h12,5 s
175 km/hTop speed170 km/h
1390 ccEngine displacement1390 cc
75 HPPower75 HP
107 NmTorque114 Nm
4Cylinders4

Fuel & Consumption

PetrolFuel typePetrol
43 ltFuel tank50 lt
7 ltUrban consumption9,7 lt
5 ltExtra-urban consumption5,7 lt
6,4 ltAverage consumption7 lt

Transmission & Chassis

Front-wheel driveDrivetrainFront-wheel drive
5Gears5
165/65 R13 STyre size175/70 R13; 175/65 R14
YesABSYes

Dimensions

3709 mmLength4150 mm
1616 mmWidth1639 mm
1395 mmHeight1416 mm
850 KgWeight940 Kg
2472 mmWheelbase2472 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

1996 Renault Clio and 2000 Renault Clio approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Renault Clio leads the E-Kıyasla score by 1 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…