DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

2000 Dacia Nova vs 1996 Renault Clio Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Dacia Nova

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 1 points.

47.25–46.25
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

DaciaMakeRenault
NovaModelClio
2000Model year1996
SedanBody typeHatchback
5Seats5
4Doors3/5

Performance

14,0 s0–100 km/h11,3 s
162 km/hTop speed175 km/h
1390 ccEngine displacement1390 cc
75 HPPower75 HP
114 NmTorque107 Nm
4Cylinders4

Fuel & Consumption

PetrolFuel typePetrol
44 ltFuel tank43 lt
8,3 ltUrban consumption7 lt
5,6 ltExtra-urban consumption5 lt
6,7 ltAverage consumption6,4 lt

Transmission & Chassis

Front-wheel driveDrivetrainFront-wheel drive
5Gears5
165/70 R13Tyre size165/65 R13 S
YesABSYes

Dimensions

4030 mmLength3709 mm
1640 mmWidth1616 mm
1390 mmHeight1395 mm
950 KgWeight850 Kg
2475 mmWheelbase2472 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

2000 Dacia Nova and 1996 Renault Clio approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Dacia Nova leads the E-Kıyasla score by 1 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…