DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

2003 Renault Clio vs 2004 Renault Clio Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
RESULT

Tie

The two cars have the same overall E-Kıyasla score.

47.25–47.25
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

RenaultMakeRenault
ClioModelClio
2003Model year2004
HatchbackBody typeHatchback
5Seats5
3/5Doors3/5

Performance

13,0 s0–100 km/h13,0 s
170 km/hTop speed170 km/h
1149 ccEngine displacement1149 cc
75 HPPower75 HP
105 NmTorque105 Nm
4Cylinders4

Fuel & Consumption

PetrolFuel typePetrol
50 ltFuel tank50 lt
7,8 ltUrban consumption7,8 lt
4,9 ltExtra-urban consumption4,9 lt
6 ltAverage consumption6 lt

Transmission & Chassis

Front-wheel driveDrivetrainFront-wheel drive
5Gears5
175/65 R14 TTyre size175/65 R14 T
YesABSYes

Dimensions

3773 mmLength3773 mm
1639 mmWidth1639 mm
1417 mmHeight1417 mm
985 KgWeight985 Kg
2471 mmWheelbase2471 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

2003 Renault Clio and 2004 Renault Clio approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

The two cars have the same overall E-Kıyasla score. The better choice therefore depends more heavily on priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance and equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…