DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

2003 Opel Meriva vs 2003 Renault Clio Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Renault Clio

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 1 points.

46.25–47.25
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

OpelMakeRenault
MerivaModelClio
2003Model year2003
MinivanBody typeHatchback
5Seats5
5Doors3/5

Performance

17,8 s0–100 km/h13,0 s
157 km/hTop speed170 km/h
1248 ccEngine displacement1149 cc
70 HPPower75 HP
170 NmTorque105 Nm
4Cylinders4

Fuel & Consumption

DieselFuel typePetrol
53 ltFuel tank50 lt
6,4 ltUrban consumption7,8 lt
4,2 ltExtra-urban consumption4,9 lt
5,0 ltAverage consumption6 lt

Transmission & Chassis

Front-wheel driveDrivetrainFront-wheel drive
5Gears5
185/60 R15Tyre size175/65 R14 T
YesABSYes

Dimensions

4042 mmLength3773 mm
1694 mmWidth1639 mm
1624 mmHeight1417 mm
1320 KgWeight985 Kg
2630 mmWheelbase2471 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

2003 Opel Meriva and 2003 Renault Clio approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Renault Clio leads the E-Kıyasla score by 1 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…