DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

2013 Renault Clio vs 2013 Volvo V40 Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Renault Clio

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points.

60.25–59.5
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

RenaultMakeVolvo
ClioModelV40
2013Model year2013
HatchbackBody typeHatchback
5Seats5
5Doors5

Performance

8,6 s0–100 km/h9,9 s
199 km/hTop speed0 km/h
1197 ccEngine displacement1596 cc
120 HPPower120 HP
190 NmTorque240 Nm
4Cylinders4

Fuel & Consumption

PetrolFuel typePetrol
45 ltFuel tank62 lt
6,6 ltUrban consumption6,8 lt
4,4 ltExtra-urban consumption4,5 lt
5,2 ltAverage consumption5,3 lt

Transmission & Chassis

Front-wheel driveDrivetrainFront-wheel drive
6Gears6
205/45 R17Tyre size—
YesABSYes

Dimensions

4062 mmLength4369 mm
1732 mmWidth1783 mm
1448 mmHeight1420 mm
980 KgWeight1463 Kg
2589 mmWheelbase2647 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

2013 Renault Clio and 2013 Volvo V40 approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Renault Clio leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…