2000 • Renault
Clio
Renault Clio 1.1 (B/C/SB0A,B/CB0F) 2000Overall Score47.25/100
2000 Renault Clio vs 1996 Renault Clio Comparison
Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.
1996 • Renault
Clio
Renault Clio 1.2 (55 Hp) 1996Overall Score46.25/100
WINNER
Renault Clio
Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 1 points.
47.25–46.25
SPECIFICATION GROUPS
Every difference between the two cars
Basic Specifications
Renault ClioSpecificationRenault Clio
RenaultMakeRenault
ClioModelClio
2000Model year1996
HatchbackBody typeHatchback
5Seats5
3/5Doors3/5
Performance
Renault ClioSpecificationRenault Clio
15,0 s0–100 km/h15,0 s
160 km/hTop speed160 km/h
1149 ccEngine displacement1171 cc
58 HPPower55 HP
93 NmTorque84 Nm
4Cylinders4
Fuel & Consumption
Renault ClioSpecificationRenault Clio
PetrolFuel typePetrol
50 ltFuel tank43 lt
7,9 ltUrban consumption7,3 lt
5,2 ltExtra-urban consumption4,8 lt
—Average consumption6,4 lt
Transmission & Chassis
Renault ClioSpecificationRenault Clio
Front-wheel driveDrivetrainFront-wheel drive
5Gears5
165/65 R14Tyre size155/70 R13
YesABS—
Dimensions
Renault ClioSpecificationRenault Clio
3773 mmLength3709 mm
1640 mmWidth1616 mm
1417 mmHeight1395 mm
880 KgWeight915 Kg
2475 mmWheelbase2472 mm
E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note
2000 Renault Clio and 1996 Renault Clio approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.
Overall, Renault Clio leads the E-Kıyasla score by 1 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.
SIMILAR COMPARISONS
Similar comparisons
Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.
VS
VS
VS
VS
VSComments are loading…