DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

1999 Volkswagen Lupo vs 2000 Renault Clio Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Renault Clio

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 1 points.

46.25–47.25
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

VolkswagenMakeRenault
LupoModelClio
1999Model year2000
HatchbackBody typeHatchback
4Seats5
3Doors3/5

Performance

14,0 s0–100 km/h15,0 s
165 km/hTop speed160 km/h
1191 ccEngine displacement1149 cc
61 HPPower58 HP
140 NmTorque93 Nm
3Cylinders4

Fuel & Consumption

DieselFuel typePetrol
34 ltFuel tank50 lt
3,7 ltUrban consumption7,9 lt
2,7 ltExtra-urban consumption5,2 lt
3,0 ltAverage consumption—

Transmission & Chassis

Front-wheel driveDrivetrainFront-wheel drive
5Gears5
155/65 R14Tyre size165/65 R14
YesABSYes

Dimensions

3529 mmLength3773 mm
1620 mmWidth1640 mm
1470 mmHeight1417 mm
830 KgWeight880 Kg
2319 mmWheelbase2475 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

1999 Volkswagen Lupo and 2000 Renault Clio approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Renault Clio leads the E-Kıyasla score by 1 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…