2000 • Renault
Clio
Renault Clio 1.1 (B/C/SB0A,B/CB0F) 2000Overall Score47.25/100
2000 Renault Clio vs 1996 Fiat Cinquecento Comparison
Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.
1996 • Fiat
Cinquecento
Fiat Cinquecento 1.1 Sporting (54 Hp) 1996Overall Score46.25/100
WINNER
Renault Clio
Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 1 points.
47.25–46.25
SPECIFICATION GROUPS
Every difference between the two cars
Basic Specifications
Renault ClioSpecificationFiat Cinquecento
RenaultMakeFiat
ClioModelCinquecento
2000Model year1996
HatchbackBody typeHatchback
5Seats5
3/5Doors3
Performance
Renault ClioSpecificationFiat Cinquecento
15,0 s0–100 km/h13,8 s
160 km/hTop speed150 km/h
1149 ccEngine displacement1108 cc
58 HPPower54 HP
93 NmTorque88 Nm
4Cylinders4
Fuel & Consumption
Renault ClioSpecificationFiat Cinquecento
PetrolFuel typePetrol
50 ltFuel tank35 lt
7,9 ltUrban consumption—
5,2 ltExtra-urban consumption—
—Average consumption6,2 lt
Transmission & Chassis
Renault ClioSpecificationFiat Cinquecento
Front-wheel driveDrivetrainFront-wheel drive
5Gears5
165/65 R14Tyre size155/65 R13
YesABSYes
Dimensions
Renault ClioSpecificationFiat Cinquecento
3773 mmLength3227 mm
1640 mmWidth1487 mm
1417 mmHeight1435 mm
880 KgWeight735 Kg
2475 mmWheelbase2200 mm
E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note
2000 Renault Clio and 1996 Fiat Cinquecento approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.
Overall, Renault Clio leads the E-Kıyasla score by 1 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.
SIMILAR COMPARISONS
Similar comparisons
Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.
VS
VS
VS
VS
VSComments are loading…