DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

1982 Renault 9 vs 1982 Audi 100 Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Renault 9

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.25 points.

51.5–51.25
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

Renault 9SpecificationAudi 100
RenaultMakeAudi
9Model100
1982Model year1982
HatchbackBody typeSedan
5Seats5
5Doors4

Performance

Renault 9SpecificationAudi 100
—0–100 km/h14,9 s
0 km/hTop speed165 km/h
1400 ccEngine displacement1781 cc
67 HPPower75 HP
0 NmTorque138 Nm
—Cylinders4

Fuel & Consumption

Renault 9SpecificationAudi 100
PetrolFuel typePetrol
0 ltFuel tank80 lt
—Extra-urban consumption5,7 lt
—Average consumption9,8 lt

Transmission & Chassis

Renault 9SpecificationAudi 100
Front-wheel driveDrivetrainFront-wheel drive
—Gears4
155/70 R13Tyre size185/70 R14

Dimensions

Renault 9SpecificationAudi 100
—Length4793 mm
—Width1814 mm
—Height1422 mm
650 KgWeight1080 Kg
—Wheelbase2687 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

1982 Renault 9 and 1982 Audi 100 approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Renault 9 leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.25 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…