E-Kıyasla
DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

1982 Audi 100 vs 1982 Renault 9 Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Renault 9

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.25 points.

51.25–51.5
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

Audi 100SpecificationRenault 9
AudiMakeRenault
100Model9
1982Model year1982
SedanBody typeHatchback
5Seats5
4Doors5

Performance

Audi 100SpecificationRenault 9
14,9 s0–100 km/h—
165 km/hTop speed0 km/h
1781 ccEngine displacement1400 cc
75 HPPower67 HP
138 NmTorque0 Nm
4Cylinders—

Fuel & Consumption

Audi 100SpecificationRenault 9
PetrolFuel typePetrol
80 ltFuel tank0 lt
5,7 ltExtra-urban consumption—
9,8 ltAverage consumption—

Transmission & Chassis

Audi 100SpecificationRenault 9
Front-wheel driveDrivetrainFront-wheel drive
4Gears—
185/70 R14Tyre size155/70 R13

Dimensions

Audi 100SpecificationRenault 9
4793 mmLength—
1814 mmWidth—
1422 mmHeight—
1080 KgWeight650 Kg
2687 mmWheelbase—

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

1982 Audi 100 and 1982 Renault 9 approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Renault 9 leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.25 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

1982 Toyota CamryVS1982 Audi 100Toyota Camry vs Audi 1001982 and 1982 model years1982 Renault 11VS1982 Audi 100Renault 11 vs Audi 1001982 and 1982 model years1982 Ford SierraVS1982 Audi 100Ford Sierra vs Audi 1001982 and 1982 model years1982 Nissan SunnyVS1982 Audi 100Nissan Sunny vs Audi 1001982 and 1982 model years1982 Lada 2106VS1982 Audi 100Lada 2106 vs Audi 1001982 and 1982 model years

Comments are loading…