E-Kıyasla
DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

2011 RAM 1500 vs 2006 GMC Yukon Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

GMC Yukon

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points.

81.75–82.5
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

RAM 1500SpecificationGMC Yukon
RAMMakeGMC
1500ModelYukon
2011Model year2006
Pick-upBody typeOff-road vehicle
5-6Seats5
4Doors5

Performance

RAM 1500SpecificationGMC Yukon
0 km/hTop speed156 km/h
4701 ccEngine displacement4807 cc
310 HPPower278 HP
447 NmTorque393 Nm
8Cylinders8

Fuel & Consumption

RAM 1500SpecificationGMC Yukon
PetrolFuel typePetrol
98 ltFuel tank98 lt
16,7 ltUrban consumption16,8 lt
11,4 ltExtra-urban consumption13,1 lt

Transmission & Chassis

RAM 1500SpecificationGMC Yukon
4x4Drivetrain4x4
5Gears4
265/70 R17Tyre size245/75 R16
YesABSYes

Dimensions

RAM 1500SpecificationGMC Yukon
5816 mmLength5029 mm
—Width2004 mm
1922 mmHeight1943 mm
2418 KgWeight2350 Kg
3569 mmWheelbase2946 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

2011 RAM 1500 and 2006 GMC Yukon approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, GMC Yukon leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Image unavailableVSImage unavailableGMC Yukon vs RAM 15002006 and 2011 model years

Comments are loading…