DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

2006 GMC Yukon vs 2011 RAM 1500 Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

GMC Yukon

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points.

82.5–81.75
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

GMC YukonSpecificationRAM 1500
GMCMakeRAM
YukonModel1500
2006Model year2011
Off-road vehicleBody typePick-up
5Seats5-6
5Doors4

Performance

GMC YukonSpecificationRAM 1500
156 km/hTop speed0 km/h
4807 ccEngine displacement4701 cc
278 HPPower310 HP
393 NmTorque447 Nm
8Cylinders8

Fuel & Consumption

GMC YukonSpecificationRAM 1500
PetrolFuel typePetrol
98 ltFuel tank98 lt
16,8 ltUrban consumption16,7 lt
13,1 ltExtra-urban consumption11,4 lt

Transmission & Chassis

GMC YukonSpecificationRAM 1500
4x4Drivetrain4x4
4Gears5
245/75 R16Tyre size265/70 R17
YesABSYes

Dimensions

GMC YukonSpecificationRAM 1500
5029 mmLength5816 mm
2004 mmWidth—
1943 mmHeight1922 mm
2350 KgWeight2418 Kg
2946 mmWheelbase3569 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

2006 GMC Yukon and 2011 RAM 1500 approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, GMC Yukon leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…