E-Kıyasla
DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

2017 RAM 1500 vs 2014 Ford Flex Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Ford Flex

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 1 points.

80.75–81.75
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

RAM 1500SpecificationFord Flex
RAMMakeFord
1500ModelFlex
2017Model year2014
Pick-upBody typeSUV
5-6Seats6-7
4Doors5

Performance

RAM 1500SpecificationFord Flex
0 km/hTop speed0 km/h
3604 ccEngine displacement3496 cc
305 HPPower364 HP
364 NmTorque475 Nm
6Cylinders6

Fuel & Consumption

RAM 1500SpecificationFord Flex
PetrolFuel typePetrol
98 ltFuel tank71 lt
—Urban consumption14,7 lt
—Extra-urban consumption10,2 lt
—Average consumption13,1 lt

Transmission & Chassis

RAM 1500SpecificationFord Flex
4x4Drivetrain4x4
8Gears6
265/70 R17Tyre size235/60 R17
YesABSYes

Dimensions

RAM 1500SpecificationFord Flex
6043 mmLength5130 mm
—Width1930 mm
1965 mmHeight1727 mm
3795 mmWheelbase2995 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

2017 RAM 1500 and 2014 Ford Flex approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Ford Flex leads the E-Kıyasla score by 1 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

2017 Ford ExplorerVSImage unavailableFord Explorer vs RAM 15002017 and 2017 model years2014 Ford FlexVSImage unavailableFord Flex vs RAM 15002014 and 2017 model years2014 Ford TaurusVSImage unavailableFord Taurus vs RAM 15002014 and 2017 model yearsImage unavailableVSImage unavailableLincoln MKS vs RAM 15002014 and 2017 model yearsImage unavailableVSImage unavailableLincoln MKT vs RAM 15002014 and 2017 model years

Comments are loading…