E-Kıyasla
DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

2014 Ford Flex vs 2017 RAM 1500 Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Ford Flex

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 1 points.

81.75–80.75
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

Ford FlexSpecificationRAM 1500
FordMakeRAM
FlexModel1500
2014Model year2017
SUVBody typePick-up
6-7Seats5-6
5Doors4

Performance

Ford FlexSpecificationRAM 1500
0 km/hTop speed0 km/h
3496 ccEngine displacement3604 cc
364 HPPower305 HP
475 NmTorque364 Nm
6Cylinders6

Fuel & Consumption

Ford FlexSpecificationRAM 1500
PetrolFuel typePetrol
71 ltFuel tank98 lt
14,7 ltUrban consumption—
10,2 ltExtra-urban consumption—
13,1 ltAverage consumption—

Transmission & Chassis

Ford FlexSpecificationRAM 1500
4x4Drivetrain4x4
6Gears8
235/60 R17Tyre size265/70 R17
YesABSYes

Dimensions

Ford FlexSpecificationRAM 1500
5130 mmLength6043 mm
1930 mmWidth—
1727 mmHeight1965 mm
2995 mmWheelbase3795 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

2014 Ford Flex and 2017 RAM 1500 approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Ford Flex leads the E-Kıyasla score by 1 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

2014 Infiniti Q50VS2014 Ford FlexInfiniti Q50 vs Ford Flex2014 and 2014 model years2014 Nissan 370ZVS2014 Ford FlexNissan 370Z vs Ford Flex2014 and 2014 model years2014 Infiniti G35VS2014 Ford FlexInfiniti G35 vs Ford Flex2014 and 2014 model years2015 Infiniti Q60VS2014 Ford FlexInfiniti Q60 vs Ford Flex2015 and 2014 model yearsImage unavailableVS2014 Ford FlexVolkswagen Passat CC vs Ford Flex2014 and 2014 model years

Comments are loading…